Opposed thinking

Opposed thinking

Opposed thinking is a kind of thinking in which habits of thought are triggered without the intervention of conscious thought. You can recognise Opposed thinking when you see it;
  • The discussion has only 2 options
  • Depending on your perspective, one of these options is good and the other is bad.
  • People generally feel emotionally attached to their position.
The dogma of Opposed thinking is that everything can be defined by two opposites. These opposites create an invisible agenda that limits our options and denies anything else that is not described in terms of one opposite or the other.
The world is complex and our choices can have important consequences. When this is combined with the emotional discomfort of uncertainty, the quality of our thinking is impaired. We look for external experts to give us the easy answers of a black and white world. This allows us to quickly move from fear and uncertainty to safety and the security of external authority.
Opposed thinking is endemic in public conversations around issues of the day. Politics is a domain of life where Opposed thinking is obvious with the split of parties into the left and the right. The political left-right Dyad hides the nuances of a much more complex world. Each side represents one pole of a larger but “hidden” (third force) whole.
 
The 6 features of Opposed thinking are;
1. Dyadic
A Dyad is any system that has 2 "terms"; the architecture of Opposed thinking is the Dyad. Not only does Opposed thinking only provide 2 options but each of those options only has 2 evaluations; either right or wrong (true or false).
2. Uncertainty and emotional discomfort
Uncertainty in the face of important consequences and complexity leads people to feel emotionally uncomfortable. Our habitual response to discomfort is to move away from it as quickly as possible. One of the best ways to doing this is to look to external authorities to tell us what to do.
3. Externalised authority
Opposed thinking is a function of Projected authority whereby authority is external to us. We look to external authorities to tell us what to do; and quickly please. In projecting authority onto another person or institution we abdicate responsibility for exploring our own thinking on the issue. This is the death of curiosity, nuance and responsibility for better choices.
4. Objective Truth
Opposed Thinking also projects a “third person” objectivity onto the world that doesn’t exist. Primary Dyad distinctions like subject and object or subjective and objective are outdated Cartesian artefacts of a world where an implicit Projected authority asserts the idea of an absolute truth and then defines what it is.
5. Blindness to context
George Gurdjieff said that we are Third force blind which is blindness to the Reconciling force which brings relationship and wholeness to a situation. Opposed thinking is a way of perceiving & thinking which only sees one option at a time, and doesn't recognise the larger contextual "whole" of which the opposites are "parts", and relatively arbitrary ones at that. A dyad sees 2 possibilities. A Triad sees infinite possibilities.
Opposed thinking creates a number of false dichotomies
  • Free will vs determinism
  • capitalism vs communism
  • right vs wrong
6. A habit of thought
We generally think of habits as only being associated with physical behaviours but they are just as evident in our thinking, our attention and our valuing. Habituality is simply an automatic connection between a stimulus and a matching response. Once a habit is formed it becomes very difficult to change, and because it is automatic we often forget about the alternatives. The options become a cultural habit of thinking which unconsciously frames the issue such that no other narratives or choices are considered anymore. Opposed thinking is habitual and programmed; nothing new is created out of Opposed thinking
 

Bridled Autopilot and Together Thinking

Opposed thinking is a function of Bridled autopilot which gives it the characteristic nature of the Dyad. Whereas Opposed Thinking is a function of the Dyad, when this structure is transcended then thinking shifts to become Together thinking.
 

Sources and influences

Gurdjieff on Formatory thinking

Formatory thinking is the term that George Gurdjieff gave to what I call Opposed thinking. The “Formatory Apparatus” is his name for the mechanical (habitualised) part of the intellectual centre. Opposite "either-or" thinking, can count to 2 only (yes-no, for-against, right-wrong, good-bad). It does not think; it can only recite.
"It is always possible to recognise ‘formatory thinking.’ For instance, formatory centre can count only up to two. It always divides everything in two: ‘bolshevism and fascism,’ ‘workers and bourgeois,’ proletarians and capitalists’ and so on. We owe most modern catchwords to formatory thinking, and not only catchwords but in modern popular theories. Perhaps it is possible to say that at all times all popular theories are formatory."
 

William Page on Opposite thinking

"Opposite thinking is not really thinking. It is a way the mind categorises ideas by opposites: if this is true, then that must be false. One of the characteristics of opposite thinking is that it compares ideas to find differences. It is also incapable of holding more than two ideas at a time. The aim of opposite thinking is not to understand, it is to pigeonhole ideas: is this idea right or wrong, is it liberal or conservative, is it scientific or religious?"
"Another hallmark of opposite thinking is that it results in opinions rather than understanding. Opinions are beliefs that stop understanding. We have all met people who hold a particular political view and believe that anything that contradicts that view is wrong."
 

You might also like

Together thinking

Together thinking

Habituality

Habituality